So, I just came across the following Substack post:
Now, I know the guys there at Irrational Modoxism, (which is NOT happygoluckypersonage’s blog btw - he’s a guest writer) and I knew immediately why he was banned. Irrational Modoxism is not the place to spread kefira. It is primarily a defense of the Chareidi interpretation of Judaism, and commenting there is thus limited to those who accept Judaism and agree to its authority. If you don’t believe in it, you don’t have a say in what interpretation is valid.
I’ll illustrate it with a small vort:
My Rebbe once asked "why do we translate all the pesukim by Eisav legnai? For example, “vayesht - and he drank and he did not make a bracha” or “vayakam and he got up and he did not make a bracha”. There’s no indication in the pesukim or medrashim that was indeed the case!”
He answered: To teach us that Eisav wrote himself out of Yiddishkeit, and thus had no more say on the matter! Even if he really did make a bracha, he had no way to correct us as he placed himself chutz lamachane.
The lesson is clear: For one’s criticism to be effective, it must come from within. That is why Rabbi Slifkin’s criticisms are effective. And why Dov Ber’s are not - because he is perceived of being from outside.
Anyways, Yeshivish mode off:
I personally disagree with Irrationalist Modoxism stance on this - I think comments should be censored based on their perceived level of intelligence, not their halachic fidelity. So Shimshon and test, out, but well thought out kefira that deserves a good answer, in. But I fully understand Irrationalist Modoxism’s position.
I would add one caveat: While I think that banning kofrim and kefira from the comments is indeed a valid choice, that is for intracommunity posts. Someone who does not accept halacha should not have say about what halacha says about organ transplants, nor have the opportunity to go on a full-fledged rant about amalekite babies. But if the post is about answering questions on the Torah from science (e.g., age of the universe) I do think that banning kefira just weakens one’s position. Since the post is dealing about how the Torah deals with the outside world, banning them just increases the bubble and stops real answers from being found. Of course, the question must be relevant and on topic, and not a full-fledged sheitel cholent amalekite babies verbal tantrum.
I happen to agree with last paragraph. The administrative decision wasn't mine, but the offending comment was just totally off topic.
This is one of the biggest reasons why I became a "kofer" in the first place. I remember thinking to myself: if Judaism is really true, why does it require massive censorship to be believed? Why did I feel so afraid of reading other points of view? Why was I subconsciously trying to avoid thinking certain thoughts? *Why does religion require so many dirty tricks to protect and perpetuate itself?* This behavior is *exactly* what we would expect from people who are deceiving themselves to keep a false belief system artificially alive.
And also I find it rather disgusting of you to be so dismissive of the concern about amalekite babies. The Torah's support for nazi-style exterminationism was one of the main things that got me questioning in the first place. This always bothered me 100000x more than any Torah and science concerns.